Bibliography

Adamowski, Natascha. “Productive Indeterminacy: On the Relationship between Play and Science.” Technology and Language 3, no. 4 (2022): 8–20. https://doi.org/10.48417/technolang.2022.04.02.

Aebischer, Pascale. Shakespeare, Spectatorship and the Technologies of Performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Akhimie, Patricia. Shakespeare and the Cultivation of Difference: Race and Conduct in the Early Modern World. New York: Routledge, 2018.

Akrich, Madeleine. “Actor Network Theory, Bruno Latour, and the CSI.” Social Studies of Science 53, no. 2 (2023): 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231158102.

Albanese, Denise. New Science, New World. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996.

Al-Gailani, Salim. “Magic, Science and Masculinity: Marketing Toy Chemistry Sets.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A 40, no. 4 (2009): 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.10.006.

Altman, Joel. The Improbability of Othello: Rhetorical Anthropology and Shakespearean Selfhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Anable, Aubrey. “Platform Studies.” Feminist Media Histories 4, no. 2 (2018): 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2018.4.2.135.

Anderegg, Michael. Orson Welles, Shakespeare, and Popular Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.

Anderson, Judith H. “Wonder and Nostalgia in Hamlet.” Studies in English Literature 1500–1900 58 (2018): 353–372. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/696435/.

Ardis, Kelly. “All the World’s a (Virtual) Stage: CSUB Computer Science Faculty, Student Win Award for Shakespeare Mixed-Reality Game.” California State University, Bakersfield. February 1, 2023. https://news.csub.edu/all-the-worlds-a-virtual-stage.

Ask, Kristine. “The Value of Calculations: The Coproduction of Theorycraft and Player Practices.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 36, no. 3 (2016): 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467617690058.

Atanasoski, Neda, and Kalindi Vora. Surrogate Humanity: Race, Robots, and the Politics of Technological Futures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019.

Aubrey, John. Brief Lives, Chiefly of Contemporaries, Set Down by John Aubrey, between the Years 1669 & 1696. 2 vols. Edited by Andrew Clark. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1898.

Aune, M. G. “From Cultural Tourists to Shakespeare Fans: The Stratford Festival and the Construction of Audience.” Borrowers and Lenders 12, no. 2 (2019): 1–25. https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/231.

Azimi, Mehran. “Skeletal Joint Smoothing White Paper,” Kinect for Windows SDK: Kinect for Windows 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8.” Microsoft Learn. September 2023. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/previous-versions/windows/kinect-1.8/jj131429(v=ieb.10).

Bacon, Francis. De augmentis scientiarum. 1623. Amsterdam: Printed by Joannis Ravesteinij, 1662.

———. De augmentis scientiarum. 1623. In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, edited by John M. Robertson, reprinted from the texts and translations of Robert Leslie Ellis and James Spedding, 413–638. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1905

———. New Atlantis. [1624] 1627. In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, edited by John M. Robertson, reprinted from the texts and translations of Robert Leslie Ellis and James Spedding, 710–732. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1905.

———. The Novum Organon, or A True Guide to the The Interpretation of Nature. 1620. Translated by G. W. Kitchin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1855.

———. Novum organum. 1620. In Bacon’s Novum Organum, 2nd ed., edited by Thomas Fowler, 183–599. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1889.

———. Novum organum. 1620. In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, edited by John M. Robertson, reprinted from the texts and translations of Robert Leslie Ellis and James Spedding, 256–587. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1905.

———. Novum organum. 1620. In The Works of Francis Bacon, 3 vols., edited and translated by Basil Montague, vol. 3, 343–425. Philadelphia: A. Hart, 1852.

———. Of the Advancement and Proficience of Learning; or, The partitions of sciences. Nine books. Written in Latin by the Most Eminent, Illustrious, and Famous Lord Francis Bacon Baron of Verulam, Vicount St. Alban, Councellor of Estate, and Lord Chancellor of England. [De augmentis scientiarum, 1623]. Interpreted by Gilbert Wats. Oxford: Printed by Leon Lichfield Printer to the University, for Robert Young and Edward Forrest, 1640.

———. The Proficience and Advancement of Learning. 1605. In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, edited by John M. Robertson, reprinted from the texts and translations of Robert Leslie Ellis and James Spedding, 39–176. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1905.

———. Valerius Terminus. [c. 1603–] 1734. In The Philosophical Works of Francis Bacon, edited by John M. Robertson, reprinted from the texts and translations of Robert Leslie Ellis and James Spedding, 177–206. London: George Routledge and Sons, 1905.

Balds, Treena. “Beckett’s Calculus of the Subject: The Performance of Spatial and Self-Relations in …but the clouds….” Journal of Literature and Science 11, no. 1 (2018): 82–105. https://doi.org/10.12929/jls.11.1.06.

———. “Krapp’s Last Tape and Breath as Algorithmic Performances: A Heuristic.” TDR/The Drama Review 63, no. 4 (2019): 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1162/dram_a_00874.

Ball, Robert Hamilton. Shakespeare on Silent Film: A Strange Eventful History. London: Allen and Unwin, 1968.

Balsamo, Anne Marie. Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.

Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.

Barnes, Barry and David Bloor. “Relativism, Rationalism, and the Sociology of Knowledge.” In Rationality and Relativism, edited by Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, 21–47. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982.

Barker, Francis, and Peter Hulme. “Nymphs and Reapers Heavily Vanish: The Discursive Con-Texts of The Tempest.” In Alternative Shakespeares, edited by John Drakakis, 191–205. London and New York: Methuen, 2002.

Barthes, Roland. “The Brain of Einstein.” 1957. In Mythologies, 68–70. Translated by Anette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang, 1972.

———. “The Death of the Author.” In Image Music Text, 142–148. Translated by Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang, 1977.

Basit, Meral. “The UC Davis ModLab.” The California Aggie, January 29, 2017. https://theaggie.org/2017/01/29/the-uc-davis-modlab/.

Bazerman, Charles. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988.

BBC News. “Researcher Creates ‘Holodeck’ with Oculus and Kinect.” BBC News. May 16, 2014. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27437769.

Beer, Gillian. Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. 1983. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Beitz, Mike. “Staging Shakespeare First Festival Video Game.” Stratford Beacon Herald. March 4, 2013. https://www.stratfordbeaconherald.com/2013/03/04/staging-shakespeare-first-festival-video-game/.

Bagnall, Gregory. “Queer(ing) Gaming Technologies: Thinking on Constructions of Normativity Inscribed in Digital Gaming Hardware.” In Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw, 135–144. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Biagioli, Mario. Galileo’s Instruments of Credit : Telescopes, Images, Secrecy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.

———. “Postdisciplinary Liaisons: Science Studies and the Humanities.” Critical Inquiry 35, no. 4 (2009): 816–33. https://doi.org/10.1086/599586.

Billington, Michael. “The Tempest Review – Beale’s Superb Prospero Haunts Hi-Tech Spectacle.” The Guardian. November 18, 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2016/nov/18/the-tempest-review-simon-russell-beale-rsc.

Bishop, Tom, Gina Bloom, and Erika T. Lin, eds. Games and Theater in Shakespeare’s England. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553525.

Bissonnette, Sylvie. Affect and Embodied Meaning in Animation: Becoming-Animated. New York: Routledge, 2019.

Blair, Ann. The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.

Bloom, Gina. Gaming the Stage: Playable Media and the Rise of English Commercial Theater. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2018.

———. “Videogame Shakespeare: Enskilling Audiences through Theater-Making Games.” Shakespeare Studies 43 (2015): 114–127. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1732100783.

———. Voice in Motion: Staging Gender, Shaping Sound in Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.

Bloom, Gina, and Amanda Shores. “Play the Knave Theatre Videogame in Schools: From Glitchy Connections to Virtual Collaboration.” In Reimagining Shakespeare Education: Teaching and Learning Through Collaboration, edited by Liam E. Semler, Claire Hansen, and Jacqueline Manuel, 251–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.

Bloom, Gina, Anston Bosman, and William N. West. “Ophelia’s Intertheatricality, or, How Performance Is History.” Theatre Journal 65, no. 2 (2013): 165–182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24580384.

Bloom, Gina, and Lauren Bates. “Play to Learn: Shakespeare as Decolonial Praxis in South African Schools.” Shakespeare in Southern Africa 34, no. 1 (2021): 7–22. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-iseasosa_v34_n1_a2.

Bloom, Gina, Nicholas Toothman, and Evan Buswell. “Playful Pedagogy and Social Justice: Digital Embodiment in the Shakespeare Classroom.” In Shakespeare Survey 74: Shakespeare and Education, edited by Emma Smith, 30–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.

Bloom, Gina, Sawyer Kemp, Nicholas Toothman, and Evan Buswell. “‘A whole theater of others’: Amateur Acting and Immersive Spectatorship in the Digital Shakespeare Game ‘Play the Knave.’” Shakespeare Quarterly 67, no. 4 (2016): 408–430. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2016.0054.

Bogost, Ian. Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.

Boluk, Stephanie, and Patrick LeMieux, Metagaming: Playing, Competing, Spectating, Cheating, Trading, Making, and Breaking Videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Borsuk, Amy. “Innovating Shakespeare: The Politics of Technological Partnership in the Royal Shakespeare Company’s The Tempest (2016).” Humanities 8, no. 1 (2019): 42, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/h8010042.

Boulter, Jonathan. Parables of the Posthuman: Digital Realities, Gaming, and the Player Experience. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2015.

Bradbury, Jill Marie. “Audiences, American Sign Language, and Deafness in Shakespeare Performance.” Shakespeare Bulletin 40, no. 1 (2022): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1353/shb.2022.0002.

Brain, Robert Michael. The Pulse of Modernism: Physiological Aesthetics in Fin-de-Siècle Europe. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2015.

Bremmer, Jan N. The Early Greek Concept of the Soul. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983.

Bristol, Michael D. Big-Time Shakespeare. London: Routledge, 1996.

Brooks, Michael. Free Radicals: The Secret Anarchy of Science. New York: Overlook Press, 2012.

Brotton, Jerry. “‘This Tunis, sir, was Carthage’: Contesting Colonialism in The Tempest.” In Post-Colonial Shakespeares, edited by Ania Loomba and Martin Orkin, 35–54. London, Routledge, 1998.

Brown, Bryan Keith. A History of the Theater Laboratory. London: Routledge, 2019.

Brown, Mark. “Kinect Hacks Already Yielding Impressive Results.” Wired, November 16, 2010. https://www.wired.com/2010/11/kinect-hacks-2/.

Brown, Nathan. The Limits of Fabrication: Materials Science, Materialist Poetics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.

Brown, Paul. “‘This thing of darkness I acknowledge mine’: The Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism.” In Political Shakespeare: New Essays in Cultural Materialism, edited by Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfeld, 48–71. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1985.

Bucchi, Massimiano. Newton’s Chicken: Science in the Kitchen. 2013. Translated by Tania Aragona. Singapore: World Scientific, 2021.

Buchanan, Judith. “Shakespeare and the Magic Lantern” In Shakespeare Survey 62: Close Encounters with Shakespeare’s Text, edited by Peter Holland, 191–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Bui, Hanh. “The Mirror and Age in Shakespeare’s Sonnets.” In Shakespeare’s Things: Shakespearean Theatre and the Non-Human World in History, Theory, and Performance, edited by Brett Gamboa and Lawrence Switzky, 66–78. New York: Routledge, 2020.

Bukatman, Scott. Terminal Identity: The Virtual Subject in Postmodern Science Fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993.

Burdick, Anne, Johanna Drucker, Peter Lunenfeld, Todd Presner, and Jeffrey Schnapp. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.

Burt, Richard, and Julian Yates. What’s the Worst Thing You Can Do to Shakespeare? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Buse, Katherine. “Genesis Effects: Growing Planets in 1980s Computer Graphics.” Configurations 29 (2021): 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2021.0012.

———. “The Working Planetologist: Speculative Worlds and the Practice of Climate Science.” In Practices of Speculation: Modeling, Embodiment, Figuration, 51–76. Edited by Jeanne Cortiel, Christine Hanke, Jan Simon Hutta, and Colin Milburn. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447512.

Bushnell, Rebecca. “Videogames and Hamlet: Experiencing Tragic Choice and Consequences.” In Games and Theater in Shakespeare’s England, edited by Tom Bishop, Gina Bloom, and Erika T. Lin, 229–253. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553525.

Bye, Kent. “#82: Oliver ‘Doc_Ok’ Kreylos on VR Input Device Speculation & Sensor Fusion Combinations, Developing a Linux SDK, VR Video Rending Pipeline, & Building a Digital Humanities VR Research Lab at UC Davis.” Voices of VR podcast, October 21, 2014. https://voicesofvr.com/82-oliver-doc_ok-kreylos-on-vr-input-device-speculation-sensor-fusion-combinations-developing-a-linux-sdk-vr-video-rending-pipeline-building-a-digital-humanities-vr-research-lab-humanitie/.

Callon, Michel. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” Supplement, The Sociological Review 32, no. S1 (May 1984): S196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.

Campbell, Mary Blaine. Wonder and Science: Imagining Worlds in Early Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1999.

Campos, Luis A. Radium and the Secret of Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.

Canaday, John. The Nuclear Muse: Literature, Physics, and the First Atomic Bombs. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000.

Cao, Zhe, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. “Realtime Multi-Person 2d Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields.” In CVPR 2017: Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1302–1310. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.143.

Cardano, Girolamo. The De Subtilitate of Girolamo Cardano. 1550. 2 vols. Edited and translated by John M. Forrester, with an introduction by John Henry and John M. Forrester. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2013.

Carroll, Jordan S. “Geek Temporalities and the Spirit of Capital.” Post45 3 (2019). https://post45.org/2019/08/geek-temporalities-and-the-spirit-of-capital/.

———. “The Lifecycle of Software Engineers: Geek Temporalities and Digital Labor.” In Practices of Speculation: Modeling, Embodiment, Figuration, 209–220. Edited by Jeanne Cortiel, Christine Hanke, Jan Simon Hutta, and Colin Milburn. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447512.

Cartelli, Thomas. “Prospero in Africa: The Tempest as Colonialist Text and Pretext.” In Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology, edited by Jean E. Howard and Marion F. O’Connor, 99–115. New York: Methuen, 1987.

—–. Repositioning Shakespeare: National Formations, Postcolonial Appropriations. London: Routledge, 1999.

Case, Sue-Ellen. Performing Science and the Virtual. London: Routledge, 2007.

Causey, Matthew. “The Screen Test of the Double: The Uncanny Performer in the Space of Technology.” Theatre Journal 51, no. 4 (1999): 383–94.

Cave, Stephen, Kanta Dihal, and Sarah Dillon, eds. AI Narratives:A History of Imaginative Thinking about Intelligent Machines. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Cetera-Włodarczyk, Anna, Jonathan Hope, and Jarosław Włodarczyk. “Unsphered, Disorbed, Decentred: Shakespeare’s Astronomical Imagination.” Shakespeare 17 (2021): 400–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2021.1968478.

Chaganti, Seeta. Strange Footing: Poetic Form and Dance in the Late Middle Ages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018.

Chang, Alenda Y. Playing Nature: Ecology in Video Games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2019.

Chang, Edmond Y. “Queergaming.” In Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw, 15–23. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Charnes, Linda. “Reading for the Wormholes: Micro-Periods from the Future.” Early Modern Culture: An Electronic Seminar 6 (2007). https://emc.eserver.org/1-6/charnes.html.

Chiari, Sophie, and Mickaël Popelard, eds. Spectacular Science, Technology and Superstition in the Age of Shakespeare. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

Christianson, J. R. “Tycho Brahe’s German Treatise on the Comet of 1577: A Study in Science and Politics.” Isis 70 (1979): 110–140.

Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. Control and Freedom: Power and Paranoia in the Age of Fiber Optics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.

Clark, Naomi, and Merritt Kopas. “Queering Human-Game Relations.” First Person Scholar, February 18, 2015. https://www.firstpersonscholar.com/queering-human-game-relations/.

Clarke, Arthur C. Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry into the Limits of the Possible. 1962. Revised ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1973.

Coffey, Donna. ‘As in a Theatre’: Scientific Spectacle in Bacon’s New Atlantis.” Science as Culture 13 (2004): 259–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950543042000226639.

Coffin, Charles Monroe. John Donne and the New Philosophy. 1937. New York: Humanities Press, 1958.

Cohen, Adam Max. Shakespeare and Technology: Dramatizing Early Modern Technological Revolutions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

Colbert, Daniel T., and Richard E. Smalley. “Fullerene Tinker Toys.” In Modular Chemistry, edited by Josef Michl, 601–607. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1997.

Coleman, Beth. Hello Avatar: Rise of the Networked Generation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.

Collins, Harry. Gravity’s Kiss: The Detection of Gravitational Waves. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017.

———. “The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks.” Science Studies 4, no. 2 (1974): 165–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400.

Collins, H. M., and Steven Yearley. “Epistemological Chicken.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 301–326. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Consalvo, Mia. Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.

Cowles, Henry M. The Scientific Method: An Evolution of Thinking from Darwin to Dewey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.

Craig, Edward Gordon. “The Actor and the Über-Marionette.” In On the Art of the Theater, 54–94. London: William Heinemann, 1911.

Craig, Leon Harold. Philosophy and the Puzzles of Hamlet: A Study of Shakespeare’s Method. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.

Crease, Robert P. The Play of Nature: Experimentation as Performance. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.

Curtis, Scott. The Shape of Spectatorship: Art, Science, and Early Cinema in Germany. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.

Cypher, Mark. “Unpacking Collaboration: Non-Human Agency in the Ebb and Flow of Practice-Based Visual Art Research.” Journal of Visual Art Practice 16, no. 2 (2017): 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2017.1292379.

Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books, 2007.

Daston, Lorraine, and Katharine Park. Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150–1750. New York: Zone Books, 1998.

Davidson, Cathy N., and Danica Savonick. “Digital Humanities: The Role of Interdisciplinary Humanities in the Information Age.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 2nd ed., edited by Robert Frodeman, 159–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198733522.013.14.

Davies, Abe. Imagining the Soul in Premodern Literature. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

Day, Jeffrey A. “ModLab: Exploring the Humanities in the Digital World.” UC Davis College of Letters and Science, December 1, 2016. https://lettersandscience.ucdavis.edu/news/modlab-exploring-humanities-digital-world.

Dear, Peter. Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Dear, Peter, ed. The Literary Structure of Scientific Argument: Historical Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1991.

de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by Steven Rendall. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

de Chadarevian, Soraya and Nick Hopwood, eds. Models: The Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.

Deegan, Marilyn, and Willard McCarty, eds. Collaborative Research in the Digital Humanities. New York: Routledge, 2012.

Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Translated by Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1983.

Desai, Adhaar Noor. “Scientific Misrule: Francis Bacon at Gray’s Inn.” Philological Quarterly 98 (2019): 119–136. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2237803484.

Desmet, Christy, and Robert Sawyer, eds. Shakespeare and Appropriation. New York: Routledge, 1999.

Dhaliwal, Ranjodh Singh. “The Cyber-Homunculus: On Race and Labor in Plans for Computation.” Configurations 30 (2022): 377–409. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2022.0028.

Dickson, Vernon Guy. “Agency within Analog Shakespearean Games.” Borrowers and Lenders 13, no. 3 (2021): 1–26. https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/335.

Dolan, Frances E. True Relations: Reading, Literature, and Evidence in Seventeenth-Century England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.

Donaldson, Peter S. “Game Space/Tragic Space: Julie Taymor’s Titus.” In A Companion to Shakespeare and Performance, edited by Barbara Hodgdon and William B. Worthen, 457–477. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005.

Donne, John. The Anniversaries. 1611–1612. In The Variorum Edition of the Poetry of John Donne, vol. 6, edited by Gary A. Stringer et al., 5–37. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995.

Doyle, Richard. On Beyond Living: Rhetorical Transformations of the Life Sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.

Drucker, Johanna. SpecLab: Digital Aesthetics and Projects in Speculative Computing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

Duhem, Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. New York: Atheneum, 1977.

Dumit, Joseph. “Game Design as STS Research.” Engaging Science, Technology, and Society 3 (2017): 603–612. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2017.132.

———. “Lagging Realities: Temporal Exploits and Mutant Speculations.” In Practices of Speculation: Modeling, Embodiment, Figuration, edited by Jeanne Cortiel, Christine Hanke, Jan Simon Hutta, and Colin Milburn, 97–116. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447512.

Dunlop, Alexander. “Fooles of Nature: The Epistemology of Hamlet.” English Literary Renaissance 50 (2020): 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1086/708230.

Eamon, William. Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.

Elliot, Natalie. “Shakespeare’s Worlds of Science.” The New Atlantis 54 (2018): 31–50. https://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/shakespeares-worlds-of-science.

Empson, William. Essays on Renaissance Literature. Vol. 1: Donne and the New Philosophy. Edited by John Haffenden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

———. Essays on Renaissance Literature. Vol. 2: The Drama. Edited by John Haffenden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Endres, Bill. “A Literacy of Building: Making in the Digital Humanities.” In Making Things and Drawing Boundaries, edited by Jentery Sayers, 44–54. University of Minnesota Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.7.

Ensmenger, Nathan. “Is Chess the Drosophila of Artificial Intelligence?: A Social History of an Algorithm.” Social Studies of Science 42, no. 1 (2011): 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711424596.

Espinosa, Ruben. Shakespeare on the Shades of Racism. London: Routledge, 2021. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429060618.

Faber, Liz. The Computer’s Voice: From Star Trek to Siri. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2020.

Falk, Dan. The Science of Shakespeare: A New Look at the Playwright’s Universe. New York: Thomas Dunne Books, 2014.

Fazel, Valerie M., and Louise Geddes. The Shakespeare Multiverse: Fandom as Literary Praxis.  New York: Routledge, 2021.

Valerie Fazel and Louise Geddes, eds., The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

Fallon, Kris. “Streams of the Self: The Instagram feed as Narrative Autobiography.” Interactive Film and Media Journal 1, no. 2 (2021): 100–116.

Fedorova, Ksenia. Tactics of Interfacing: Encoding Affect in Art and Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.

Feyerabend, Paul. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1975.

Findlen, Paula. “Between Carnival and Lent: The Scientific Revolution at the Margins of Culture.” Configurations 6, no. 2 (1998): 243–167. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.1998.0016.

———. “Jokes of Nature and Jokes of Knowledge: The Playfulness of Scientific Discourse in Early Modern Europe.” Renaissance Quarterly 43, no. 2 (1990): 292–331. https://doi.org/10.2307/2862366.

———. Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

Fiveash, Kelly. “Strange Bedfellows – The Tempest Review: Real-Time Digital Avatar Brews Storm in a Teacup.” Ars Technica, November 25, 2016, https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/11/tempest-review-real-time-digital-avatar-performance-capture/.

Flaherty, Jennifer. “Shakespeare’s Gamer Girls: Playable Female Characters.” Borrowers and Lenders 13, no. 3 (2021): 1–24. https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/337.

Francoeur, Eric. “The Forgotten Tool: The Design and Use of Molecular Models.” Social Studies of Science 27 (1997): 7–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631297027001002.

Gaboury, Jacob. Image Objects: An Archaeology of Computer Graphics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.

Galey, Alan, and Stan Ruecker. “How a Prototype Argues.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 25 (2010): 405–424. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq021.

Galison, Peter. How Experiments End. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

———. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997.

Galloway, Alexander R. Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.

Gamboa, Brett, and Lawrence Switzky, eds. Shakespeare’s Things: Shakespearean Theatre and the Non-Human World in History, Theory, and Performance. New York: Routledge, 2020.

Garber, Marjorie. Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality. 1987. Routledge Classics 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2010.

Gardner, Helen L. “Lawful Espials.” The Modern Language Review 33 (1938): 345–355. https://doi.org/10.2307/3715401.

Garrison, John S. “Mirrors and Macbeth’s Queer Materialism.” In Shakespeare’s Things: Shakespearean Theatre and the Non-Human World in History, Theory, and Performance, edited by Brett Gamboa and Lawrence Switzky, 53–65. New York: Routledge, 2020.

Gatti, Hilary. Essays on Giordano Bruno. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Gauvin, Jean-François. Instruments of Knowledge: Finding Meaning in Objects, Habits, and Museums. Leiden: Brill, 2023.

———. “Playing with Quantum Toys: Julian Schwinger’s Measurement Algebra and the Material Culture of Quantum Mechanics Pedagogy at Harvard in the 1960s.” Physics in Perspective 20, no. 1 (2018): 8–42.

———. “The Next Level of Play: How Cartesian Devils, Volcanoes, and Quantum Toys Taught General Science at Harvard, 1730–1970.” Journal of the History of Collections 31, no. 3 (2019): 531–46.

Gaycken, Oliver. Devices of Curiosity: Early Cinema and Popular Science. New York: Oxford University Press, 2015.

Gee, Brian. “Amusement Chests and Portable Laboratories: Practical Alternatives to the Regular Laboratory.” In The Development of the Laboratory: Essays on the Place of Experiment in Industrial Civilization, edited by Frank A. J. L. James, 37–59. London: Macmillan, 1989.

Ghosh, Bishnupriya. The Virus Touch: Theorizing Epidemic Media. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2023.

Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE Publications, 1994.

Gillies, John. “Towards a Phenomenology of Shakespeare’s Sky.” Linguaculture 14 (2023): 69–82. doi:10.47743/lincu-2023-1-0331.

Glazener, Nancy. “Print Culture as an Archive of Dissent: Or, Delia Bacon and the Case of the Missing Hamlet.” American Literary History 19 (2007): 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajm009

Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday and Anchor Books, 1959.

Goodall, Jane R. Performance and Evolution in the Age of Darwin: Out of the Natural Order. London: Routledge, 2002.

Gorton, Ceri. Space to Play: Making Arts & Technology Collaborations Work. Royal Shakespeare Company, 2017. https://cdn2.rsc.org.uk/sitefinity/corporate/b7061_tempest_impact-report_v10.pdf?sfvrsn=5cb33c21_0.

Gray, Kishonna L. Intersectional Tech: Black Users in Digital Gaming. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2020.

Griffin, Gabriele, and Matt Steven Hayler. “Collaboration in Digital Humanities Research – Persisting Silences.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 12, no. 1 (2018). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/12/1/000351/000351.html.

Gross, Alan G. Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 2006.

Grotowski, Jerzy. Towards a Poor Theater. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968.

Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.

Hacking, Ian. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Halberstam, Jack. The Queer Art of Failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.

———. “Queer Gaming: Gaming, Hacking, and Going Turbo.” In Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw, 187–199. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Hall, Kim F. Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995.

Halpin, Jenni G. Contemporary Physics Plays: Making Time to Know Responsibility. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave, 2018.

Haraway, Donna J. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. 1996. Second ed. London: Routledge, 2018.

———. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge, 1989.

———. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective” In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 183–201. New York: Routledge, 1991.

Harding, Sandra. Objectivity and Diversity: Another Logic of Scientific Research. University of Chicago Press, 2015.

Harkness, Deborah E. The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the Scientific Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.

Harris, Jonathan Gil. Untimely Matter in the Time of Shakespeare. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009.

Harrison, Matthew. “Review of Play the Knave.” Borrowers and Lenders 14, no. 1 (2022): 1–4. https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/299.

Harrison, Matthew, and Michael Lutz. “South of Elsinore: Actions that a Man Might Play.” In The Shakespeare User: Critical and Creative Appropriations in a Networked Culture, edited by Valerie M. Fazel and Louise Geddes, 23–40. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

Hayles, Katherine N. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.

———. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

———. My Mother Was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Henderson, Diana E. Collaborations with the Past: Reshaping Shakespeare across Time and Media. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.

Hemming, Sarah. “A Spellbinding Tempest at the Barbican, London.” Financial Times, July 7, 2017. https://www.ft.com/content/7f411eea-630d-11e7-91a7-502f7ee26895.

Hilgartner, Stephen. Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.

Holton, Gerald. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. 1973. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Hua, Minh, and Rita Raley. “Playing with Unicorns: AI Dungeon and Citizen NLP.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 14, no. 4 (2020). https://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/4/000533/000533.html.

Huang, Alexa, and Elizabeth. Rivlin. Shakespeare and the Ethics of Appropriation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2014.

Hui, Andrew. “Horatio’s Philosophy in Hamlet.” Renaissance Drama 41 (2013): 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1086/673910.

Huizinga, Johan. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1949.

Hunter, John, Katherine Faull, and Diane Jakacki. “Reifying the Maker as Humanist.” In Making Things and Drawing Boundaries, edited by Jentery Sayers, 130–138. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Hyman, Wendy Beth. “‘Beyond Beyond’: Cymbeline, the Camera Obscura, and the Ontology of Elsewhere.” English Literary Renaissance 52 (2022): 397–412.

Jacob, François. The Statue Within: An Autobiography. Translated by Franklin Philip. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1995.

Jagoda, Patrick. Experimental Games: Critique, Play, and Design in the Age of Gamification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020.

Jarrett, Joseph. Mathematics and Late Elizabethan Drama. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Jochum, Elizabeth Ann, and Todd Murphey. “Programming Play: Puppets, Robots, and Engineering.” In The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance, edited by Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell, 308–321. London: Routledge, 2014.

Johnson, Colin. “Jamming Performance with Media Materiality in Glitchbody / Nanostalgia [1454-2015].” Revista Corpo-grafías: Estudios críticos de y desde los cuerpos 6, no. 6 (2019): 153–165.

John-Steiner, Vera. Creative Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Jones, Ian Bryce. “Do the Locomotion: Obstinate Avatars, Dehiscent Performances, and the Rise of the Comedic Video Game.” Velvet Light Trap 77 (2016): 86–99. https://doi.org/10.7560/VLT7706.

Jones, Matthew L. Reckoning with Matter: Calculating Machines, Innovation, and Thinking About Thinking from Pascal to Babbage. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2016.

Jones, Steven E. The Emergence of the Digital Humanities. New York and London: Routledge, 2013.

———. “New Media and Modeling: Games and the Digital Humanities.” In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 84–97. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2016.

Juul, Jesper. The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.

Kaethler, Mark. “All the Game Is a Stage: The Controller and Interface in Shakespearean Videogames.” In The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Interface, edited by Clifford Werier, and Paul Budra, 44–57. New York: Routledge, 2022.

Kaiser, David. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.

Kakoudaki, Despina. Anatomy of a Robot: Literature, Cinema, and the Cultural Work of Artificial People. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2014.

Kalas, Rayna. Frame, Glass, Verse: Technology of Poetic Invention in the English Renaissance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007.

Kastan, David Scott. “‘The Duke of Milan / And His Brave Son’: Old Histories and New in The Tempest.” In Shakespeare’s Romances, edited by Alison Thorne, 226–44. New Casebooks. Hampshire, England: Palgrave, 2002.

Kavan, Ladislav, Steven Collins, Jiří Žára, and Carol O’Sullivan. “Skinning with Dual Quaternions.” In I3D 2007: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, edited by Stephen N. Spencer, 39–46. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1145/1230100.1230107.

Keene, Melanie. “Every Boy & Girl a Scientist: Instruments for Children in Interwar Britain.” Isis 98, no. 2 (2007): 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1086/518188.

Keller, Evelyn Fox. A Feeling for the Organism: The Life and Work of Barbara McClintock. 1983. 10th anniversary ed. New York: W. H. Freeman, 1993.

———. Secrets of Life, Secrets of Death: Essays on Language, Gender, and Science. New York: Routledge, 1992.

Kemp, Sawyer. “Escape Rooms and the Seductive Ubiquity of Capture.” Analog Game Studies 4, no. 5 (2017). https://analoggamestudies.org/2017/11/escape-rooms-and-the-seductive-ubiquity-of-capture/.

Kerschbaumer, Florian, and Tobias Winnerling, eds. Early Modernity and Video Games. Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.: Cambridge Scholars, 2014.

Kinney, Arthur F. Shakespeare’s Webs: Networks of Meaning in Renaissance Drama. London: Routledge, 2004.

Keogh, Brendan. A Play of Bodies: How We Perceive Videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2018.

Kernighan, Brian W., and John R. Mashey. “The UNIX™ Programming Environment.” Software: Practice and Experience 9, no. 1 (1979): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.4380090102.

Kidnie, Margaret Jane. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge, 2009.

King, Katie. Networked Reenactments: Stories Transdisciplinary Knowledges Tell. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2012.

Kirby, David A. Lab Coats in Hollywood: Science, Scientists, and Cinema. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.

Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

Klein, Julie Thompson. Interdisciplining Digital Humanities: Boundary Work in an Emerging Field. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2015.

Klein, Ursula. Experiments, Models, Paper Tools: Cultures of Organic Chemistry in the Nineteenth Century. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.

Koenig, Rebecca. “What ‘Shakespeare Karaoke’ Teaches About the Virtual Reality Future.” EdSurge, July 13, 2022, https://www.edsurge.com/news/2022-07-13-what-shakespeare-karaoke-teaches-about-the-virtual-reality-future.

Kohler, Robert E. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

Kozel, Susan. Closer: Performance, Technologies, Phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2007.

Krajewski, Markus. The Server: A Media History from the Present to the Baroque. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Krapp, Peter. Noise Channels: Glitch and Error in Digital Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.

Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 1962. 3rd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Kunzelman, Cameron. The World Is Born from Zero: Understanding Speculation and Video Games. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2022.

Lacan, Jacques. Le séminaire XXI: Les non-dupes errent, 1973–1974. Unpublished seminar, stenotypes available at “Séminaires – Jacques Lacan – Version J.L. et non J.L.,” École lacanienne de psychanalyse, 2016,  https://ecole-lacanienne.net/bibliolacan/stenotypies-version-j-l-et-non-j-l/.

Lajoie, Jason. “Applied Media Theory, Critical Making, and Queering Video Game Controllers.” Electronic Book Review, September 12, 2021. https://doi.org/10.7273/akvg-xm09.

Lane, Richard J. The Big Humanities: Digital Humanities/Digital Laboratories. London: Routledge, 2017.

Lanier, Douglas. Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Larson, Brendon. Metaphors for Environmental Sustainability: Redefining Our Relationship with Nature. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2011.

Laszlo, Pierre. “Playing with Molecular Models.” Hyle 6, no. 1 (2000): 85–97. https://www.hyle.org/journal/issues/6/laszlo.htm.

Latour, Bruno. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” In The Science Studies Reader, edited by Mario Biagioli, 258–275. New York: Routledge, 1999.

———. The Pasteurization of France. 1984. Translated by Alan Sheridan and John Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.

———. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

———. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.

Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Lauteria, Evan W. “Envisioning Queer Game Studies: Ludology and the Study of Queer Game Content.” In Queerness in Play, 35–53. Edited by Todd Harper, Meghan Blythe Adams, and Nicholas Taylor. Cham: Palgrave, 2018.

———. “Ga(y)mer Theory: Queer Modding as Resistance.” Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 12, no. 2 (2012). https://reconstruction.eserver.org/122/Lauteria_Evan.shtml. Archived by the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine at https://web.archive.org/web/20121125073944/https://reconstruction.eserver.org/122/Lauteria_Evan.shtml.

Law, John, and John Hassard, eds. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell/The Sociological Review, 1999.

Lawrence, Christopher, and Steven Shapin, eds. Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Le, Binh Huy, and Jessica K. Hodgins. “Real-Time Skeletal Skinning with Optimized Centers of Rotation.” ACM Transactions on Graphics 35, no. 4 (2016): 37, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897824.2925959.

Lenoir, Timothy, ed. Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998.

Levine, George. Dying to Know: Scientific Epistemology and Narrative in Victorian England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.

Loomba, Ania. Shakespeare, Race, and Colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Lutz, Michael, ed. “Shakespeare and Gaming.” Special issue, Borrowers and Lenders 13, no. 3 (2021). https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/issue/view/7.

MacKay, Ellen. “The Moods of Gamification in The Tempest.” In Games and Theatre in Shakespeare’s England, edited by Tom Bishop, Gina Bloom, and Erika T. Lin, 203–228. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553525.

Magnenat-Thalmann, Nadia, Richard Laperrière, and Daniel Thalmann. “Joint-Dependent Local Deformations for Hand Animation and Object Grasping.” In Proceedings of Graphics Interface 1988, edited by Darwyn R. Peachey, 26–33. Toronto: Canadian Information Processing Society, 1989. https://doi.org/10.20380/GI1988.04.

Mahaffy, Caitlin. “Richard Reborn: Neo-Early Modern Performance in Dragon Age: Origins (2009).” Borrowers and Lenders 13, no. 3 (2021). https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/336.

Maisano, Scott. “Shakespeare’s Last Act: The Starry Messenger and the Galilean Book in Cymbeline.” Configurations 12 (2004): 401–434. https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2007.0003.

Malazita, James W. Enacting Platforms: Feminist Technoscience and the Unreal Engine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2024.

Malazita, James W., Ezra J. Teboul, and Hined Rafeh. “Digital Humanities as Epistemic Cultures: How DH Labs Make Knowledge, Objects, and Subjects.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 14, no. 3 (2020). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/3/000465/000465.html.

Marchitello, Howard. The Machine in the Text: Science and Literature in the Age of Shakespeare and Galileo. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Marcotte, Jess. “Queering Control(lers) through Reflective Game Design Practices.” Game Studies 18, no. 3 (2018). https://gamestudies.org/1803/articles/marcotte.

Martin, Emily. “The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles.” Signs 16 (1991): 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1086/494680.

Marx, John, and Mark Garrett Cooper. Media U: How the Need to Win Audiences Has Shaped Higher Education. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.

Maus, Katharine Eisaman. Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Mazzio, Carlo. “The History of Air: Hamlet and the Trouble with Instruments.” South Central Review 26 (2009): 153–196. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40211295.

———. “Shakespeare and Science, c. 1600.” South Central Review 26 (2009): 1–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40211289.

McGurl, Mark. Everything and Less: The Novel in the Age of Amazon. New York: Verso, 2021.

McIlroy, M. D., E. N. Pinson, and B. A. Tague. “UNIX Time-Sharing System: Forward.” The Bell System Technical Journal 57, no. 6 (July–Aug 1978): 1899–1904. https://archive.org/details/bstj57-6-1899.

McPherson, Tara. Feminist in a Software Lab: Difference + Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.

Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1980.

———. “Francis Bacon and the ‘Vexations of Art’: Experimentation as Intervention.” The British Journal for the History of Science 46 (2013): 551–599. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087411000665.

———. ‘“The Violence of Impediments”: Francis Bacon and the Origins of Experimentation.” Isis 99 (2008): 731–760. https://doi.org/10.1086/597767.

Mialet, Hélène. Hawking Incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the Anthropology of the Knowing Subject. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012.

Milburn, Colin. “Ahead of Time: Gerald Feinberg and the Governance of Futurity.” Osiris 34, no. 1 (2019): 216–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/703511.

———. “In the Loop: Science Fiction and the Reordering of Human–Technology Relations.” In Science Fiction: Voyage to the Edge of the Imagination, edited by Glyn Morgan and Charlotte Grievson, 46–67. London: Hudson and Thames, 2022.

———. “Modifiable Futures: Science Fiction at the Bench.” Isis 101, no. 3 (2010): 560–69.

———. Mondo Nano: Fun and Games in the World of Digital Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.

———. Nanovision: Engineering the Future. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.

———. Respawn: Gamers, Hackers, and Technogenic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2018.

Milburn, Colin, Katherine Buse, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, Melissa Wills, Raida Aldosari, Patrick Camarador, Josh Aaron Miller, and Justin Siegel. “Join the Fold: Video Games, Science Fiction, and the Refolding of Citizen Science.” Design Issues 39, no. 1 (2023): 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00707.

Milburn, Colin, and Melissa Wills. “Citizens of the Future: Science Fiction and the Games of Citizen Science.” Science Fiction Film and Television 14, no. 2 (2021): 115–144. https://doi.org/10.3828/sfftv.2021.10.

Miller, Josh Aaron, Katherine Buse, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, Seth Cooper, Justin Siegel, and Colin Milburn, “Wrapped in Story: The Affordances of Narrative for Citizen Science Games.” In Foundations of Digital Games 2023. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582437.3582443.

Misak, John, and Kevin LaGrandeur. “Perchance to Read: Developing an Augmented Reality Game to Increase Student Engagement with Hamlet.” Early Modern Culture Online 7, no. 1 (2020) pp. 19–44. https://doi.org/10.15845/emco.v7i1.2835.

Mitchell, Liam. Ludopolitics: Videogames against Control. Winchester: Zero Books, 2018.

Monea, Alexander. “Race and Computer Vision.” In The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence: Net Politics in the Era of Learning Algorithms, edited by Sudmann Andreas, 189–208. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript Verlag, 2019.

Montfort, Nick, and Ian Bogost. Racing the Beam: The Atari Video Computer System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2009.

Montrose, Louis. The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Mori, Masahiro. “The Uncanny Valley.” 1970. Translated by Karl F.MacDorman and Norri Kageki. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine 19, no. 2 (2012): 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811.

Mountford, Fiona. “The Tempest, Theatre Review: Set Sail for a Choppy Journey.” Evening Standard, July 7, 2017. https://www.standard.co.uk/culture/theatre/the-tempest-theatre-review-set-sail-for-a-choppy-journey-a3681726.html.

Muller, John P., and William J. Richardson, eds. The Purloined Poe: Lacan, Derrida, and Psychoanalytic Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.

Munns, David P. D. A Single Sky: How an International Community Forged the Science of Radio Astronomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.

Myers, Greg. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.

Myers, Natasha. Rendering Life Molecular: Models, Modelers, and Excitable Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.

Myers, Natasha, and Joseph Dumit. “Haptic Creativity and the Mid-Embodiments of Experimental Life.” In A Companion to the Anthropology of the Body and Embodiment, 239–261. Edited by Frances E. Mascia-Lees. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Nae, Andrei. “Playing with Shakespeare in Silent Hill and Manhunt 2: From Reverence to Rejection.” Borrowers and Lenders 13, no. 3 (2021). https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/334.

Nakamura, Lisa. Cybertypes: Race, Ethnicity and Identity on the Internet. New York: Routledge, 2002.

Ndiaye, Noémie. Scripts of Blackness: Early Modern Performance Culture and the Making of Race, RaceB4Race: Critical Race Studies of the Premodern. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2022.

Neff, Michael, Nicholas Toothman, Robeson Bowmani, Jean E. Fox Tree, and Marilyn A. Walker. “Don’t Scratch! Self-Adaptors Reflect Emotional Stability.” In Intelligent Virtual Agents, edited by Hannes Högni Vilhjálmsson, Stefan Kopp, Stacy Marsella, and Kristinn R. Thórisson, 398–411. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_43.

Nelson, Robin. Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

Nguyen, Josef. The Digital Is Kid Stuff: Making Creative Laborers for a Precarious Economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2021.

Nguyen, Josef, and Amanda Phillips. “GameCamp! Procedural Thinking Workshop.” GameCamp! (blog). 2015. https://ucdavisgamecamp.wordpress.com/archive/workshop-2015/.

Novitz, Julian. “‘The Time Is out of Joint’: Interactivity and Player Agency in Videogame Adaptations of Hamlet.” Arts 9, no. 4 (2020): 122, 1–17.. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts9040122.

Nunes, Mark. Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures. New York: Continuum, 2011.

O’Brien, Jane. “Re-imagining Shakespeare’s Plays in Virtual Reality Game.” Edited by Bill McKenna, filmed by Maxine Collins and John Landy. BBC News, April 19, 2016. BBC television broadcast recording available online at BBC News, April 19, 2016. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-36076442.

O’Gorman, Marcel. Necromedia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2015.

O’Neill, Stephen, ed. Broadcast Your Shakespeare: Continuity and Change across Media. London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2018.

Orgel, Stephen. “The Comedian as the Character C.” In English Comedy, edited by Michael Cordner, Peter Holland, and John Kerrigan, 36–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

Omodeo, Pietro Daniel. Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance: Reception, Legacy, Transformation. Leiden: Brill, 2014.

Osborne, Laurie. “iShakespeare: Digital Art/Games, Intermediality, and the Future of Shakespearean Film.” Shakespeare Studies 38 (2010): 48–57. https://www.proquest.com/docview/821046300/.

Otis, Laura. Müller’s Lab. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Palfrey, Simon. Shakespeare’s Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.

Park, Katherine. “Bacon’s ‘Enchanted Glass.’” Isis 75 (1984): 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1086/353482.

———. “Nature in Person: Medieval and Renaissance Allegories and Emblems.” In The Moral Authority of Nature, edited by Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal, 50–73. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.

———. Secrets of Women: Gender, Generation, and the Origins of Human Dissection. New York: Zone Books, 2006.

Parker, Patricia A. Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.

Parker-Starbuck, Jennifer. Cyborg Theatre: Corporeal/ Technological Intersections in Multimedia Performance. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011.

Pasek, Anne. “The Problem of Nonhuman Phenomenology: or, What is it Like to Be a Kinect?” InVisible Culture 22 (2015). https://ivc.lib.rochester.edu/the-problem-of-nonhuman-phenomenology-or-what-is-it-like-to-be-a-kinect/.

Patterson, Christopher B. Open World Empire: Race, Erotics, and the Global Rise of Video Games. New York: New York University Press, 2020.

Paulson, Michael. “At This Tempest, Digital Wizardry Makes ‘Rough Magic.’” New York Times, January 4, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/04/theater/at-this-tempest-digital-wizardry-makes-rough-magic.html.

Pearl, Sharrona. About Faces: Physiognomy in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.

Penley, Constance. NASA/TREK: Popular Science and Sex in America. London: Verso, 1997.

Phillips, Amanda. “dicks dicks dicks: Hardness and Flaccidity in (Virtual) Masculinity.” Flow 24.03 (2017). https://www.flowjournal.org/2017/11/dicks-dicks-dicks/.

———. Gamer Trouble: Feminist Confrontations in Digital Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2020.

———. “Gaming.” In Digital Pedagogy in the Humanities: Concepts, Models, and Experiments, edited by Rebecca Frost Davis, Matthew K. Gold, Katherine D. Harris, and Jentery Sayers. Humanities Commons, 2020. https://digitalpedagogy.hcommons.org/keyword/Gaming.

———. “(Queer) Algorithmic Ecology: The Great Opening Up of Nature to All Mobs.” In Understanding Minecraft: Essays on Play, Community, and Possibilities, edited by Nate Garrelts, 106–120. Jefferson, NC: McFarland Publishing, 2014.

———. “Shooting to Kill: Headshots, Twitch Reflexes, and the Mechropolitics of Video Games.” Games and Culture 13 (2018): 136–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015612611.

———. “‘Welcome to My Fantasy Zone’: Bayonetta and Queer Femme Disturbance.” In Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw, 109–123. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Pickering, Andrew. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995.

Pickering, Andrew, ed. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Pitches, Jonathan. Science and the Stanislavsky Tradition of Acting. London: Routledge, 2006.

Pizelo, Samuel. “Games and the Rise of Systems Thinking: From Models to Machines.” Representations 162, no.1 (forthcoming).

Polanyi, Michael. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.

———. The Tacit Dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966.

Popelard, Mickaël. “Unlimited Science: The Endless Transformation of Nature in Bacon and Shakespeare’s The Tempest.” In Spectacular Science, Technology and Superstition in the Age of Shakespeare, edited by Sophie Chiari and Mickaël Popelard, 171–194. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.

Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. 1935. London: Hutchison, 1959.

Posner, Dassia N., Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell, eds. The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance. London: Routledge, 2014.

Poulton, Cody. “From Puppet to Robot: Technology and the Human in Japanese Theatre.” In The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance, edited by Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell, 280–293. London: Routledge, 2014.

Pressman, Jessica. Bookishness: Loving Books in a Digital Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.

Pumfrey, Stephen. “‘Your astronomers and ours differ exceedingly’: The Controversy over the ‘New Star’ of 1572 in the Light of a Newly Discovered Text by Thomas Digges.” The British Journal for the History of Science 44 (2011): 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087410001317.

Rader, Karen. Making Mice: Standardizing Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900–1955. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Raley, Rita. Tactical Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.

Ramsay, Stephen, and Geoffrey Rockwell. “Developing Things: Notes toward an Epistemology of Building in the Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by Matthew K. Gold, 75–84. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttv8hq.

Rankin, Alisha. Panaceia’s Daughters: Noblewomen as Healers in Early Modern Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

Ratto, Matt. “Critical Making.” In Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive, edited by Bas van Abel, Roel Klaassen, Lucas Evers, and Peter Troxler, 202–209. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers, 2011. https://opendesignnow.org/index.php/article/critical-making-matt-ratto/.

Ravetto-Biagioli, Kriss. The Digital Uncanny. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Ray, Meredith K. Daughters of Alchemy: Women and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.

Raymond, Eric S. The Art of Unix Programming. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2004. Online ed. available at https://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html.

Reed, Alison, and Amanda Phillips. “Additive Race: Colorblind Discourses of Realism in Performance Capture Technologies.” Digital Creativity 24 (2013): 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.808965.

Rees, Graham. “Francis Bacon’s Semi-Paracelsian Cosmology.” Ambix 22 (1975): 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1179/amb.1975.22.2.81.

Resch, Gabby, Dan Southwick, Isaac Record, and Matt Ratto. “Thinking as Handwork: Critical Making with Humanistic Concerns.” In Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities, edited by Jentery Sayers, 149–161. University of Minnesota Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctt1pwt6wq.19.

Rhee, Jennifer. The Robotic Imaginary: The Human and the Price of Dehumanized Labor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.

———. “Scrips and Scribbles.” MLN 118, no. 3 (2003): 622–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3251938.

———. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.

Roberts-Smith, Jennifer, Shawn DeSouza-Coelho, and Toby Malone. “Staging Shakespeare in Social Games: Towards a Theory of Theatrical Game Design.” Borrowers and Lenders 10, no. 1 (2016): 1–19. https://borrowers-ojs-azsu.tdl.org/borrowers/article/view/278.

Rorty, Richard. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. 1979. Princeton Classics ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.

Rosenheim, Shawn James. The Cryptographic Imagination: Secret Writing from Edgar Poe to the Internet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.

Rowe, Katherine. “Crowd-Sourcing Shakespeare: Screen Work and Screen Play in Second Life.” Shakespeare Studies 38 (2010): 58–67. https://www.proquest.com/docview/821046406/.

Royal Shakespeare Company. “400 Years in the Making: Intel x the RSC.” YouTube, May 24, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfKcucNfN2M.

Royal Shakespeare Company. “Prospero Meets Ariel.” YouTube, March 24, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH6qvx5PSq8.

Royal Shakespeare Company. “The Tempest and Intel.” YouTube, March 24, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RW5Hab1uJEA.

Roychoudhury, Suparna. Phantasmatic Shakespeare: Imagination in the Age of Early Modern Science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018.

Ruberg, Bonnie. Video Games Have Always Been Queer. New York: New York University Press, 2019.

Ruberg, Bonnie, moderator. “The Arts of Failure: Jack Halberstam in Conversation with Jesper Juul.” In Queer Game Studies, edited by Bonnie Ruberg and Adrienne Shaw, 201–210. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Ruberg, Bonnie, and Adrienne Shaw, eds. Queer Game Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2017.

Saltz, David Z. “Live Media: Interactive Technologies and Theatre.” Theatre Topics 11 (2001): 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1353/tt.2001.0017.

Salus, Peter H. A Quarter Century of UNIX. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1994.

Savage, Karen, and Dominic Symonds. Economies of Collaboration in Performance: More than the Sum of the Parts. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018.

Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in Renaissance Culture. London: Routledge, 1995.

———. Engines of the Imagination: Renaissance Culture and the Rise of the Machine. London: Routledge, 2008.

Sawyer, Keith R. Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration. New York: Basic Books, 2007.

Sayers, Jentery, Devon Elliott, Kari Kraus, Bethany Nowviskie, and William J. Turkel. “Between Bits and Atoms: Physical Computing and Desktop Fabrication in the Humanities.” In A New Companion to Digital Humanities, edited by Susan Schreibman, Ray Siemens, and John Unsworth, 1–21. Chichester: Wiley, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch1.

Schaberg, Christopher. The Work of Literature in an Age of Post-Truth. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018.

Schiebinger, Londa. The Mind Has No Sex?: Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.

Schleiner, Anne-Marie. The Player’s Power to Change the Game: Ludic Mutation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2017.

Schmalzer, Madison D. “Janky Controls and Embodied Play: Disrupting the Cybernetic Gameplay Circuit.” Game Studies 20, no. 3 (2020). https://www.gamestudies.org/2003/articles/schmalzer.

Searles, Colette. “Unholy Alliances and Harmonious Hybrids: New Fusions in Puppetry and Animation.” In The Routledge Companion to Puppetry and Material Performance, edited by Dassia N. Posner, Claudia Orenstein, and John Bell, 194–307. London: Routledge, 2014.

Serres, Michel. “Literature and the Exact Sciences.” Translated by Roxanne Lapidus. SubStance 18, no. 2 (1989): 3–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685308.

Shapin, Steven. “The Philosopher and the Chicken: On the Dietetics of Disembodied Knowledge.” In Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge, edited by Christopher Lawrence and Steven Shapin, 21–50. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

Shapin, Steven. “Pump and Circumstance: Robert Boyle’s Literary Technology.” Social Studies of Science 14, no. 4 (1984): 481–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014004001.

Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.

Shepherd-Barr, Kirsten. Science on Stage: From Doctor Faustus to Copenhagen. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006.

Shotton, Jamie, Andrew Fitzgibbon, Mat Cook, Toby Sharp, Mark Finocchio, Richard Moore, Alex Kipman, and Andrew Blake. “Real-Time Human Pose Recognition in Parts from Single Depth Images.” In CVPR 2011: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1297–1304. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995316.

Singh, Jyotsna C. Shakespeare and Postcolonial Theory. London: Bloomsbury, 2019.

Skura, Meredith Anne. “Discourse and the Individual: The Case of Colonialism in The Tempest.” Shakespeare Quarterly 40 (1989): 42–69. https://doi.org/10.2307/2870753.

Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth and the Human. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2005.

Smith, Pamela H. The Body of the Artisan: Art and Experience in the Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2004.

Smoodin, Eric Loren. Paris in the Dark: Going to the Movies in the City of Light, 1930–1950. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020.

Sneesby-Koch, Ann. “Building STEAM: The Buzz from the McBee Hive.” National Endowment for the Humanities, Office of Digital Humanities (blog), September 7, 2013. https://www.neh.gov/divisions/odh/featured-project/building-steam-the-buzz-the-mcbee-hive.

Sokal, B. J. A Brave New World of Knowledge: Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Early Modern Epistemology. Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson Press, 2003.

Spatz, Ben. What a Body Can Do: Technique as Knowledge, Practice as Research. London: Routledge, 2015.

Spiller, Elizabeth. Science, Reading, and Renaissance Literature: The Art of Making Knowledge, 1580–1670. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

———. “Shakespeare and the Making of Early Modern Science: Resituating Prospero’s Art.” South Central Review 26 (2009): 24–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40211290.

Squier, Susan Merrill. Liminal Lives: Imagining the Human at the Frontiers of Biomedicine. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004.

Stanislavski, Konstantin. An Actor’s Work: A Student’s Diary. 1938/1953. Translated and edited by Jean Benedetti. London: Routledge, 2008.

———. My Life in Art. 1926. Translated and edited by Jean Benedetti. London: Routledge, 2008..

Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (1989): 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.

Steele, Samara Hayley. “The Maker Turn in Classroom Games: An Articulation of Gamemaking in Education (GME).” In GENeration Analog 2021: Proceedings of the Tabletop Games and Education Conference, edited by Evan Torner, Shelly Jones, Edmond Chang, Megan Condis, and Aaron Trammell, 5–27. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University ETC Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.17613/zyaa-rr71.

Stevens, Hallam. Life out of Sequence: A Data-Driven History of Bioinformatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013.

Stone, Allucquère Rosanne. The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.

Sturgess, Kim C. Shakespeare and the American Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Suchman, Lucy. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions. 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Sutil, Nicolás Salazar. Motion and Representation: The Language of Human Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.

Svensson, Patrik. Big Digital Humanities: Imagining a Meeting Place for the Humanities and the Digital. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.

Taylor, Paul. “The Tempest, Royal Shakespeare Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, Review: Simon Russell Beale in the Most Profoundly Moving Performance of His Career.” The Independent, November 18, 2016. https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/theatre-dance/reviews/the-tempest-royal-shakespeare-theatre-stratford-upon-avon-simon-russell-beale-gregory-doran-a7424881.html.

Thies, Justus, Michael Zollhöfer, Marc Stamminger, Christian Theobalt, and Matthias Nießner. “Face2Face: Real-Time Face Capture and Reenactment of RGB Videos.” In CVPR 2016: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2387–2395. Piscataway, NJ: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.262.

Tiffany, Daniel. Toy Medium: Materialism and Modern Lyric. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.

Timplalexi, Eleni. “Shakespeare in Digital Games and Virtual Worlds.” Multicultural Shakespeare 18, no. 3 (2018): 129-144. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.18.09.

Toothman, Nicholas, and Michael Neff. “The Impact of Avatar Tracking Errors on User Experience in VR.” In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, edited by Rob Teather et al., 756–766. Piscataway: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798108.

Toothman, Nicholas, Tyler Martin, and Michael Neff. “Embodying Digital Creativity: Designing Computer Tools to Support Spontaneity and Creative Work in the Arts.” In Digital Movement: Essays in Motion Technology and Performance, edited by Sita Popat and Nick Salazar. Houndmills, Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, 2015. 221–235.

Trainor, James. “Experience Shakespeare in Video Game Form with Play the Knave, Part of the UI First Folio! Activities.” Little Village, September 6, 2016. https://littlevillagemag.com/experience-shakespeare-in-video-game-form-with-play-the-knave-part-of-the-ui-first-folio-activities/;

Traweek, Sharon. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.

Tromble, Meredith. “Very Complex Matter: Collaborations in Art and Geobiology.” Artnodes 20 (2017): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i20.3146.

Turner, Gerard L’E. “Scientific Toys.” The British journal for the history of science 20, no. 4 (1987): 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400024195.

Turner, Henry S. The English Renaissance Stage: Geometry, Poetics, and the Practical Spatial Arts 1580–1630. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

———. Shakespeare’s Double Helix. London: Continuum, 2007.

UC Davis College of Letters and Science, “Learning the Bard by Playing the Knave.” YouTube, October 9, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4g8yA1Cnt98.

UC Davis Humanities Institute. “What Can Humanists Learn from Gamers?” UC Davis Humanities Institute, October 11, 2011. https://dhi.ucdavis.edu/news/what-can-humanists-learn-gamers.

Usher, Peter D. Shakespeare and the Dawn of Modern Science. Amherst: Cambria Press, 2010.

Warley, Christopher. “Specters of Horatio.” English Literary History 75 (2008): 1023–1050. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.0.0021.

Wark, McKenzie. Gamer Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.

Wason P. C. “On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 12 (1960): 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470216008416717.

Wason, P. C. and P. N. Johnson-Laird. Psychology of Reasoning: Structure and Content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.

Watson, James D. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York: Atheneum, 1968.

Way, Geoffrey. “Shakespeare Videogames, Adaptation/Appropriation, and Collaborative Reception.” In Games and Theater in Shakespeare’s England, edited by Tom Bishop, Gina Bloom, and Erika T. Lin, 255–273. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553525.

Webster, Charles. The Great Instauration. Science, Medicine and Reform, 1626–1660. London: Duckworth, 1975.

Weis, Martin. “Assassin’s Creed and the Fantasy of Repetition.” In Early Modernity and Video Games, edited by Tobias Winnerling and Florian Kerschbaumer, 201–211. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2014.

———. “Marty Weis ’15—Game the Room.” School of Business and Economics, Sonoma State University, 2017. https://sbe.sonoma.edu/marty-weis.

Werier, Clifford. “Reading Shakespeare: Interface and Cognitive Load.” In The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Interface, edited by Clifford Werier and Paul Budra, 15–28. New York: Routledge, 2022.

Werier, Clifford, and Paul Budra, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Shakespeare and Interface. New York: Routledge, 2022.

Wershler, Darren, Lori Emerson, and Jussi Parikka, The Lab Book: Situated Practices in Media Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2021.

Werth, Tiffany, ed. The Shakespearean International Yearbook: Volume 15, Special Section: Shakespeare and the Human. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis, an imprint of Routledge, 2017.

West, William N. “What’s the Matter with Shakespeare?: Physics, Identity, Playing.” South Central Review 26 (2009): 103–126. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40211293.

Westman, Robert S. The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.

Wilde, Poppy. Posthuman Gaming: Avatars, Gamers, and Entangled Subjectivities. London: Routledge, 2023.

Williams, William Carlos. Spring and All. 1923. In The Collected Poems of William Carlos Williams: 1909–1939, edited by A. Walton Litz and Christopher John MacGowan, 175–236. New Directions, 1986.

Willis, Deborah. “Shakespeare’s Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism.” Studies in English Literature 29, no. 2 (1989): 277–89. https://doi.org/10.2307/450475.

Willis, Martin, ed. Staging Science: Scientific Performance on Street, Stage and Screen. London: Palgrave, 2016.

Wills, Melissa A. “Corporate Agriculture and the Exploitation of Life in Portal 2.” Games and Culture 14, no. 3 (2019): 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412016679771.

———. “‘La vie impossible’: Germfree Life in the Microbiome Era.” In Practices of Speculation: Modeling, Embodiment, Figuration, edited by Jeanne Cortiel, Christine Hanke, Jan Simon Hutta, and Colin Milburn, 119–143. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839447512.

Witmore, Michael. Culture of Accidents: Unexpected Knowledges in Early Modern England. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.

Worthen, W. B. Shakespeare, Technicity, Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.

Wylie, Caitlin Donahue. Preparing Dinosaurs: The Work behind the Scenes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.

Yates, Julian. “Accidental Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Studies 34 (2006): 90–122. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2157840/.

Zibell, John. “Scoring Beckett | 5C0r1n9 83Cq377.” John Zibell—Practice as Research, 2014. https://johnzibellpar.wordpress.com/.

Zurr, Ionat, and Oron Catts. Tissues, Cultures, Art. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave, 2023.